Colchester MP Will Quince Takes Up UC Assessment Period Flaw with DWP Minister Amber Rudd

Colchester MP Will Quince has made the point to the new DWP minister Amber Rudd - the need for changes to payroll software to show the date of payment of wages, not merely the date the PAYE slip was created.

The HMRC-  RTI (Real Time Information System) provides the essential information platform for Universal Credit.

This issue was taken up following an intervention by the ABC.

If the PAYE information is not added correctly, wages can be attributed to the wrong Assessment Period (AP). The first assessment period a loan can be requested from the DWP.  Putting the payment into the wrong assessment period can cause a lot of issues for claimants.

Employment Rights Act 1996

Itemised pay statement.

An employee has the right to be given by his employer, at or before the time at which any payment of wages or salary is made to him, a written itemised pay statement.

In accordance with payslip law, your employer must issue your payslip on or before your payday.

+++++

Universal Credit is not working properly and the DWP Select Committee is trying to halt the managed migration roll-out. 

Over recent months, MPs on both sides of the House of Commons have pleaded with the Government not to go ahead with transferring claimants from existing benefits to the much troubled Universal Credit until it can guarantee that every claimant would be migrated safely onto the new benefit and none would be left with no money.

Letter from Alok Sharma MP to Frank Field MP regarding managed migration, dated 1 November 2018

Response from Chair Frank Field MP to Alok Sharma MP regarding managed migration, dated 2 November 2018

Inquiry: Universal Credit

Work and Pensions Committee

The Committee is today publishing correspondence with Alok Sharma MP, Minister of State for Employment, about the Government’s plans for moving people claiming existing benefits onto Universal Credit, ahead of new rules on so-called “managed migration” being laid in Parliament. The Government announced in October that “managed migration” of claimants on to Universal Credit, originally intended to begin in early 2019, would be pushed back.   

The Government’s original plans have been widely criticised by front-line charities and others, with predictions that vulnerable people could be plunged deeper into poverty and even that some people entitled to benefits could be left with no income whatsoever. The rules have been subject to a review by the Social Security Advisory Committee (SSAC), who presented their report to DWP earlier in the autumn.

Minister refuses request to share new rules on Managed Migration

In a hearing on 18 October, the Committee asked the Minister to commit to sharing the new version of the rules with the Committee before it was formally given to Parliament, to allow the Committee to determine whether the serious concerns already raised about the plans, including in evidence to the SSAC, have been addressed. In the response being published today the Minister refuses that request. 

The Chair has urgently written again to the Minister (also attached), saying: “Given the strength of the concern about the draft regulations published in June… we can only hope that the revised version has changed beyond recognition […] if the Government has accepted the SSAC’s advice, and has fully addressed the very serious concerns expressed to the SSAC during its consultation, then our scrutiny could be very quick and need not cause any significant delay. Might I therefore ask please whether you could urgently reconsider this decision?”

Chair's Comment

Comment from Work and Pensions Committee Chair Frank Field MP:

“Having got it so disastrously wrong with its first attempt, you’d think that the Government would want to make sure its plans to move vulnerable people onto Universal Credit stood up to robust scrutiny. Instead, it is choosing to push these regulations through Parliament with no chance for MPs to make amendments. 

That hardly inspires confidence that it has really made the changes needed to ensure that its actions won’t plunge people deeper into poverty. If its new plans don’t have enough safeguards to protect the vulnerable, then MPs will be left with no option but to vote them down.”

ABC Comment, have your say below: 

,